Skip to content
StablecoinRoadmap
Request a walkthrough
For banks and fintechs

Choose the providers for your stablecoin service.

Compare provider offerings, understand market requirements, and prepare the decision with your product, operations, and compliance teams.

Request a walkthrough →Inspect a sample decision
Illustrative provider reviewAfter-hours treasury transfers
Sample
The service
Assess whether business customers need after-hours treasury transfers.
The providers
Compare existing bank rails and source-specific provider services.
The supporting information
Legal entities, market coverage, authorizations, and source documents.
The unresolved decision Open
Confirm the customer need, contracting entity, coverage, and terms before selecting a provider.

Inspect the evidence and open questions

Illustrative workplace scene of three professionals discussing a payment plan.

Know who does what before you commit.

Why Stablecoin Roadmap

A provider may offer the service you need, but the details matter: the legal entity, the markets it serves, its authorizations, and the partners it depends on. Review those details together.

Understand the offering

Review the specific service and the company responsible for providing it.

Define the review

  • Legal entity
  • Service offered
  • Markets served

See the dependencies

Examine the banking, custody, screening, and settlement services behind a payment use case.

Trace the payment

  • Funding and custody
  • Screening requirements
  • Settlement partners

Prepare the decision

Keep supporting sources and unresolved questions with your provider review.

Build the review record

  • Supporting sources
  • Evidence gaps
  • Questions for the team

After-hours treasury transfers

A sample provider decision package

See the evidence, dependencies, and open questions behind a bank payment decision.

Illustrative research example. An editorial sample, not a customer result, an approved provider shortlist, or a product-generated export. No provider has been selected and no payment has been executed.

Customer problem
A bank product team wants to understand whether eligible business customers need after-hours treasury transfers, and whether existing bank services already solve the problem.
Existing-rail baseline
Compare existing account transfers, applicable instant-payment services, and correspondent or FX arrangements. Check operating hours, recipient reach, currencies, funding, reconciliation, failure handling, and total cost for the specific corridor.
Decision status
No provider selected. Validate the customer need and existing-rail baseline, then confirm entity, coverage, authority, terms, and operational dependencies.

Sources checked . Source descriptions were checked on this date. Historical sources do not establish current availability. Confirm eligibility, coverage, and terms at decision time.

Inspect the provider evidence and open questions

JPM Coin by Kinexys

Legal entity
J.P. Morgan is the provider brand. Exact contracting legal entity for this proposed service: to confirm.
Service and instrument
The provider describes a USD deposit token on Base, using a Blockchain Deposit Account framework and approved counterparties.
Source-specific coverage
Provider-described USD and Base scope. Eligible customer markets and this bank's access are not established by this example.
Authority evidence
No regulator-register or legal-authority determination is included. A product page does not establish eligibility or permission for this bank's proposed service.
Dependencies to confirm
Confirm account onboarding, approved counterparties, cash conversion, settlement finality, operating controls, and failure recovery.
Evidence gaps
Contracting entity, jurisdiction-specific availability, fees, service terms, liability and redemption rights, and operational fit remain open.
Question for the provider
Which entity would contract with us, for which customers and markets, and under what account and service terms?
Primary source
J.P. Morgan JPM Coin product page

Provider product description. Publication date not stated on the reviewed page.

Checked .

Citi Token Services for Cash

Legal entity
The dated source identifies Citibank N.A. New York, Singapore, and London branch accounts. Confirm the contracting branch for the proposed service.
Service and instrument
Citi's FAQ describes liquidity transfers between participating branches. It says customers need neither a wallet nor token ownership.
Source-specific coverage
The 2024 source names New York, Singapore, and London. Current branch participation, customer eligibility, and currency coverage require reconfirmation.
Authority evidence
No regulator-register or legal-authority determination is included. The FAQ is provider evidence about a service, not a licensing or eligibility conclusion.
Dependencies to confirm
Participating Citi accounts and Citi-managed infrastructure. Confirm onboarding, operating controls, liquidity arrangements, and exceptions.
Evidence gaps
Current coverage, exact account terms, fees, authority evidence, finality, and failure handling remain open.
Question for the provider
Does the current service support our account structure, currencies, and required branch-to-branch flow?
Primary source
Citi Token Services for Cash FAQ

Dated provider FAQ. Published 22 February 2024; historical scope requires reconfirmation.

Checked .

Keep the monetary instruments separate

Tokenized bank deposit claims and stablecoins require separate analysis of the issuer, liability, backing, and redemption rights. Deposit insurance, finality, and regulatory treatment depend on the specific arrangement and jurisdiction.

Product owns the customer problem; operations reviews the flow and failure handling; compliance and legal review the specific entity, rights, and authority evidence.

Download editorial sample (JSON)

This download contains the same editorial example shown here. It is not an export from a customer workspace.

Start from your industry.

Industries

Each industry links to published use cases. A use case lists the provider services it needs and whether the platform can run them today.

Browse all use cases →

Bring a use case. Work through the provider decision.

How it works

Describe what you want to offer

Start with who pays, who receives the money, and the markets you want to serve.

Review providers and requirements

Explore recorded offerings, dependencies, and requirements. Inspect the sources and identify missing information.

Bring the open questions to your team

Use the evidence to discuss provider choices and next steps with product, operations, and compliance.

Walkthroughs cover research and provider review. Payment execution is simulated today.

What are you working on?

Use cases

Planning a payment service

Identify services, provider options, and questions to resolve before a pilot.

Start with the payment

  • Who pays and receives
  • Countries and currencies
  • Services to investigate

Reviewing a provider

Examine the offering, supporting evidence, and dependencies relevant to your use case.

Scope the provider review

  • Entity and offering
  • Authorizations to check
  • Partners and dependencies

Preparing an internal review

Bring recorded requirements, evidence gaps, and outstanding decisions together.

Prepare the discussion

  • Product requirements
  • Operations questions
  • Compliance evidence

See how your provider review would work.

Walkthrough

Review relevant provider information, identify open questions, and discuss whether a pilot fits.

Request a walkthrough →